A most favored corporation: Enron prevailed in federal, state lobbying efforts 49 times

By

 Updated:

Enron Corp., which ran a formidable lobbying machine in Washington and state capitals, gained favorable treatment from Congress, federal and state governments and various regulatory agencies on no fewer than 49 occasions from the late 1980s to the company's bankruptcy in December 2001, a Center for Public Integrity analysis shows.

It has been almost a year since Enron’s financial collapse created a political scandal. The company and its employees were the largest donor to President George W. Bush over the course of his political career. Kenneth Lay, the company’s CEO, had also made significant contributions to a political action committee of Attorney General John Ashcroft, first disclosed by the Center on January 9, 2002; Ashcroft recused himself from the Enron investigation within hours of the Center’s report.

Enron’s efforts to exert its influence began early in its history, the Center found. Its successful efforts to deregulate electricity and natural gas markets paved the way to its rise, and the exemptions it won from regulatory scrutiny may have contributed to its collapse. Lobbying was a critical component in both the company’s rise and fall.

The six-month analysis was based on federal and state lobby disclosure reports, documents obtained under the federal Freedom of Information Act and its state-level counterparts, thousands of news accounts from the Lexis-Nexis and Dow Jones databases, and other sources. The Center identified hundreds of issues on which Enron lobbied over the course of more than a decade and then analyzed the legislative and regulatory actions that followed the lobbying efforts.

The fallen energy giant lobbied on diverse interests that ranged from gas marketing and regulation of the broadband communications network to rules on the use of corporate planes and the gift ban (which limits the value of gifts congressional and executive branch officials can accept). The long list of issues where it tried to shape or alter public policy includes the federal budget, environmental law including efforts to address global warming, the privatization of utilities at military bases, product liability reform, the Investment Company Act of 1940, and health care reform, to name a few.

To achieve its legislative goals, Enron employed multi-pronged strategies that included doling out campaign contributions to influential politicians, employing a nationwide network of lobbyists and building grassroots support for policy changes by bankrolling think tanks and other organizations that advocated those changes. On many issues, it either allied with other companies and trade associations or was part of umbrella coalitions.

When Enron won, it was often part of a coalition of companies all seeking the same policy changes, all of whom benefited (some more than Enron). Enron joined 29 coalitions of special interests, including Americans for Affordable Electricity, for which it reportedly supplied 75 percent of the funds, and the National Wetlands Coalition, which included Amoco, Arco, Exxon and other oil companies.

While most of Enron’s lobbying efforts were directed at blocking government actions, the company also campaigned for federal subsidies and sought government assistance in doing business overseas.

The issues Enron successfully lobbied on include:

  • The 1992 Energy Policy Act, which amended the Public Utilities Holding Company Act (PUHCA) of 1935. The legislation paved the way for the initiative with which Enron has been most closely linked, deregulation. The act opened electricity transmission grids, which had been monopolized by utilities, to outside competitors. Enron, one of the main lobbyists for the legislation became the largest wholesale power marketer in the country in less than five years after the act’s passage. In 1996, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued the open-access rule, which forced utilities to unbundle generation and transmission services. On the same day the commission also ruled to facilitate the states’ restructuring of the electric industry and allowed retail customers to choose service providers.
  • In April 1992, FERC restructured interstate pipeline operations. The move, which deregulated much of the industry, allowed companies like Enron the right to buy, sell, or trade and transport gas.
  • In 1993, the Securities and Exchange Commission exempted Enron from provisions of the Public Utility Holding Company Act that banned utilities from investing in unrelated, risky businesses.
  • Enron lobbied the administration of then-Gov. George W. Bush and the Texas legislature successfully on four separate issues, including tort reform, corporate tax reductions, an industry-friendly environmental plan, and electrical deregulation.
  • In 1997, the SEC exempted Enron from the Investment Company Act of 1940 that prohibits U.S. companies from leaving debt from overseas projects off the books.
  • So far 23 states and the District of Columbia have taken steps toward deregulation. Some of these states passed restructuring legislation different from what Enron endorsed. The company had waged lobbying campaigns in most of the states.
  • The federal government extended the energy tax credit for wind-generated electrical power several times. Enron, which had a subsidiary that generated power from wind, was one of the main lobbyists for the extension of the credit.
  • The Commodity Futures Modernization Act, which Congress passed in 2000, had a provision that precluded the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) from regulating Enron’s trading in energy derivatives.

The study also found that Enron had unprecedented access to officials in all branches of government, both in Washington and in states.

The Center counted only various changes to rules—that is, the enactment of new legislation, the adoption of new regulations, or specific exemptions for Enron from regulations—in its analysis. Many of Enron’s lobbying efforts were aimed at blocking policies. For example, along with hundreds of other companies, Enron lobbied against the health care reform legislation proposed by the Clinton administration in 1994. Though the legislation did not pass, the Center’s analysis did not count this as a victory for Enron.

The company received financial backing to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollar for several of its foreign projects from agencies such as Export-Import Bank and Overseas Private Investment Corporation. Though Enron received millions of dollars in aid from OPIC and EXIM Bank, the Center did not include these grants when totaling the number of times Enron prevailed, since Enron merely took advantage of programs available to all corporations.

In the states, the Center’s analysis counted the passage of any deregulation plan that allowed Enron to either enter a market or expand its presence in a market as a favor, even if the final deregulation plan was not the one Enron lobbied for.

From think tanks to power plants

The company was formed in 1985 when Houston Natural Gas and Internorth, two regional pipeline companies, merged. Kenneth Lay, who earned a Ph.D. in economics at the University of Houston and worked in the Interior Department and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in the Nixon administration, headed the new company, which struggled with a huge debt load in the tightly regulated world of natural gas markets. Under Lay’s direction, the company rose to transport as much as 20 percent of the nation’s natural gas, to become the largest wholesaler of electrical power, the seventh largest corporation—and, when it filed for Chapter 11 in December 2001, the nation’s largest bankruptcy up to that time.

Central to Enron’s growth (and its collapse) was the company’s ability to influence federal policy. Even before Enron was formed, Lay had some success as a lobbyist. As president of Florida Gas Transmission in the mid-1970s, he pushed for natural gas deregulation. I went around the state and tried to educate all of the [Florida congressional] delegation on the importance of this battle, Lay told Forbes in an October 2002 interview. At the end of the day, I got all but two of them to cosponsor those deregulation bills.

The Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 was the result, which only partially deregulated the market and pipelines for natural gas. It wasn’t until 1993 that Enron and other companies secured complete deregulation.

Before Enron started promoting the nationwide restructuring of electricity industry, the notion of a free market for electricity was an academic issue discussed by university economists and think tank policy specialists who debated what constituted a natural monopoly. Enron made it into a political issue.

In a November 2001 article, Irwin M. Stelzer, the director of regulatory studies for the conservative Hudson Institute and a paid consultant for Enron, wrote, What Enron and Lay deserve to be remembered for is leading the fight for competition. This battle was waged in the halls of Congress, in state legislatures around the country, and in regulatory agencies on the federal, state, and local levels. It included efforts to loosen the stranglehold on electricity markets of incumbent utilities, who used their monopoly of transmission lines to beat back threats from independent generators.

Enron, which did not have any power generation capacity in its initial days, envisioned that once the market was restructured it could make millions by selling power using the transmission grids owned by giant utilities.

Thanks to sustained lobbying campaigns by the company and its allies, utility deregulation became a legislative priority on Capitol Hill for a decade. Although Enron did not achieve everything it wanted at the federal level, in the states it had more successes.

According to the Department of Energy, deregulation is currently active in 17 states and the District of Columbia, while 23 states and the District have either passed legislation or issued a regulatory order to implement retail access. All the states except Nebraska have considered restructuring at some point, according to Channele Carner, electric power industry specialist at the Department of Energy.

As recently as 2000, Enron had lobbyists in more than half the states. A Center study released in May 2002 found that Enron was registered to lobby in 28 states that year. Only 38 other entities had a lobbying presence in more states.

At the national level, the agency that bestowed the most favorable decisions on Enron was the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the organization tasked with overseeing the energy market. Many of the rulings that allowed Enron to expand businesses in natural gas as well as electricity were issued by FERC.

The open access rule, also known as FERC Order 888, and Order 636 which restructured the interstate gas pipeline regulations, went a long way in the growth of the company from a natural gas company into a global energy powerhouse.

Unlike many other advocates of deregulation, Enron wanted FERC to have more authority in a restructured market. Testifying before a House subcommittee, Enron lobbyist and former FERC Chief Elizabeth Moler said the commission should be given more authority.

The company was instrumental in the nomination of two commissioners in the early days of the Bush administration. It pushed the candidacies of Pat Wood, the chairman, and Nora Mead Brownell, who had taken a favorable position as a Pennsylvania regulator in 1997. When the latter’s nomination was in trouble because of opposition from officials from her state, Lay called Karl Rove, according to a May 2001 Wall Street Journal report.

The White House confirmed that the names of Wood and Brownell were recommended by the Enron chief.

Earlier, Lay had lobbied Bush to make Wood the head of the Texas Public Utility Commission. And Wood, a former oil man, supported electricity deregulation during his tenure in Texas.

Before he lost the job, Curtis Hébert Jr., Bush’s first nominee for the FERC chief’s post, told The New York Times that Lay had offered a deal to save his position. Hébert told the paper in May 2001 that the Enron chief had asked the commissioner to change his views on deregulation if the chairman wanted the company’s continued support in the job.

Lay confirmed having a conversation with Hébert but denied that he had made any quid pro quo demand.

Bush replaced Hébert with Wood in August 2001.

Lobbyists

A key part of Enron’s strategy was having influential lobbyists in Washington and elsewhere. Besides maintaining a stable of high-profile lobbyists with a wealth of experience in government on its payroll, the company hired top lobby firms, with a history of getting things done.

Pulling strings on behalf of Enron were such well-connected firms as Akin, Gump, Straus, Hauer & Feld; Bond Donatelli; Bracewell and Patterson; Davis Wright Tremaine; Price Waterhouse Coopers; Sideview Partners; Skadden Arps Meagher and Flom; Verner Liipfert Bernhard McPherson and Hand; Vinson & Elkins; and Quinn Gillespie.

Enron spent more than $5 million on lobbyists, both in-house and from outside firms, since 1997.

Former federal legislators who lobbied for or represented the company include Senator J. Bennett Johnston (D-La.), who chaired the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, Representative Mike Andrews, D-Texas, and Representative Ed Bethune, R-Ark.

Enron also hired a large number of officials who had previously served in the executive and legislative branches of government. Former Secretary of State James A. Baker III; former Commerce Secretary Robert Mosbacher; Brent Scowcroft, national security adviser to George Bush Sr.; Wendy Gramm, former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and wife of Senator Phil Gramm, R-Texas; former Clinton treasury official Linda Robertson; former FERC Chief Elizabeth Moler; and Marc Racicot, chairman of the Republican National Committee and former governor of Montana, have all worked for the company as either lobbyists, consultants, or members of its board of directors. Enron also hired opinion makers—both Paul Krugman, the Princeton economist who writes an opinion column for the New York Times, and Bill Kristol, the editor of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Weekly Standard, were paid for consulting work for the company.

At least three members of the Bush administration, Secretary of the Army Thomas White Jr., Bush economic adviser Lawrence B. Lindsey, who resigned Dec. 6, 2002, and Trade Representative Robert B. Zoellick, worked for Enron. Lindsey, while advising Bush on economic issues during the last presidential campaign, was also a consultant to Enron.

Coalitions

On several issues, Enron lobbied along with, or as part of, coalitions representing industries and trade groups. The Center counted nearly 30 such umbrella organizations that the company allied with.

On deregulation, the company coordinated its lobbying efforts with several groups at the state and federal level, including Americans for Affordable Electricity (AAE), a coalition of industry and consumer groups advocating restructuring, and the American Legislative Exchange Council, a group of conservative lawmakers and policy advocates championing small government and free market ideas.

Former FERC chief Moler, under whose watch the commission opened the transmission grid for wholesale suppliers, represented both AAE and Enron. Electric USA, a group that lobbied against deregulation, claimed in May 1999 that Enron was providing up to 75% of the coalition’s funding.

Two other coalitions Enron worked with on the issue were the Business Council for Sustainable Energy, a group of energy executives and companies and trade associations, and the Coalition for Competitive Energy Markets (CCEM), another industry trade alliance.

The company replicated this strategy in the states. By joining forces with PG&E Energy Services, the retail unit of PG&E Corp., and Shell Energy Services Co. LLP, part of Shell Oil Co., Enron created the New York Energy Providers Association (NESPA) to lobby New York’s Public Service Commission.

In Louisiana it reportedly funded the Alliance for Lower Electric Rates Today (ALERT), which lobbied for deregulation in the state. The Direct Access Alliance in California, the North Carolina Coalition for Customer Choice in Electricity, South Carolinians for Competitive Electricity, the Competitive Power Coalition in Massachusetts (later, Enron parted ways with the Coalition) also coordinated efforts with Enron.

Campaign donations

Since 1989, Enron, its Political Action Committee and employees contributed almost $6 million to political parties and candidates at the federal level, according to the Center for Responsive Politics (CRP). More than two-thirds of it went to Republicans.

The company showered its largesse on several influential politicians, but none more than President Bush, who received $736,800 from Enron since he first ran for Texas governor in 1994—by far the largest amount Enron has given to any one politician. Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and Phil Gramm, both Texas Republicans, received $101,500 and $101,350, respectively, from the company. Democratic Representative Ken Bentsen received $44,250 and Representative Sheila Jackson Lee, also a Democrat, took $39,200.

In 2000, Gramm, whose wife was on the board of the company, sponsored a bill to allow mutual funds to hold shares and receive income from publicly traded partnerships. Enron lobbied on the issue.

Former GOP presidential candidate and Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole received $95,650 in contributions from the company’s employees and PAC. During his Senate days Dole had championed several issues where Enron had stakes, including the Section 29 tax credit for coalbed methane. In the early 1990s, Enron was one of the biggest beneficiaries of the tax break.

One of Enron’s powerful friends in Congress was House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, R-Texas, who received $28,900 from the company employees since 1989. Deregulation legislation DeLay proposed in the 104th Congress was so favorable to the company that it was dubbed the Enron bill. Roll Call reported last February 2002 that DeLay had recommended the company to hire three political operatives in 1998 to conduct a grassroots campaign to push deregulation. Subsequently, the company hired the three strategists in early 1998: Ed Buckham, who had served as DeLay’s chief of staff just weeks before, Karl Gallant, who worked as consultant to DeLay’s political action committee, and John Hoy, a partner at Schuman, Hoy & Associates, which worked for DeLay during the 1996 GOP convention.

“Kenny Boy” and Bush

Enron’s ties to the Bushes are well documented. Ken Lay, who turned the firm from a natural gas company into a global business behemoth, was close to both George H. W. Bush and George W. Bush.

During the senior Bush’s failed 1992 re-election bid, Lay, a co-chairman of the president’s campaign, chaired the host-committee of the 1992 Republican National Convention. Between 1990 and 1992, Lay and his wife, Linda, contributed $5,000 in hard money to Bush, according to CRP.

Bush signed the two key bills that significantly altered the country’s energy landscape, the 1992 Energy Policy Act and the Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989. Enron profited from the enactment of both laws.

In an October 13, 1992 commentary in the Houston Chronicle, Lay listed these and other favors that Bush doled out to the energy industry. In the long-term interest of a strong domestic exploration and production sector, President Bush championed alternative minimum tax relief for independent oil and gas producers and fought against efforts to enact federal pre-emption of states’ pro-rationing regulation, he wrote. President Bush not only knows energy policy, he has lived it. George Bush is the energy president.’

Like father, like son

Lay has been a political and financial backer of the current president since the time Bush decided to run for Texas governor.

The Center first reported in The Buying of the President 2000 that Enron employees and directors had contributed $550,025 to Bush through June 30, 1999, making the company the top patron of the then-governor. (According to CRP, Enron has given $736,800 to Bush since 1993.)

Enron, the Lays, and Jeffrey Skilling, who briefly succeeded Lay as the CEO, each gave $100,000 to President Bush’s 2001 inaugural fund. After the Florida voting fiasco, the Lays had given $10,000 to the Bush-Cheney 2000 Recount Fund, the maximum amount the fund accepted.

Internal Revenue Service revenue records show that the Bush campaign used Enron’s corporate jets during the Florida election controversy. Bush’s Recount Fund paid more than $13,000 to Enron for the use of the company’s jets, but political campaigns typically are required to pay only a fraction of the actual costs for the flights.

Some two-dozen letters released by Texas archivists in February last year revealed that the Enron chief had personally lobbied the governor on several issues.

Lay’s first letter to Bush, on Feb. 15, 1995, was on deregulation. Bush signed the restructuring legislation in Texas in 1999.

In another letter, Lay lobbied Bush for tough tort reform legislation, which was also on the Bush legislative agenda. The tort reform bill, which limited damages in lawsuits (which primarily benefited businesses), was enacted in the state in 1995.

The correspondence also shows that Bush had intervened on Enron’s behalf on at least two occasions. In April 1997, Bush met with the ambassador of Uzbekistan at a time Enron was negotiating a huge business deal in that former Soviet republic.

You will be meeting with Ambassador Sadyq Safaev, Uzbekistan’s Ambassador to the United States on April 8th, Lay wrote Bush in a 1997 letter. Enron has established an office in Tashkent and we are negotiating a $2 billion joint venture with Neftegas of Uzbekistan, and Gazprom of Russia to develop Uzbekistan’s natural gas and transport it to markets in Europe, Kazakhstan, and Turkey. This project can bring significant economic opportunities to Texas, as well as Uzbekistan. ... I know you and Ambassador Safaev will have a productive meeting which will result in a friendship between Texas and Uzbekistan.

Another important law that Bush signed in Texas was a sweeping overhaul of the corporate tax system that lowered levies on businesses, an issue Enron had pushed.

Enron’s close ties to the Bush gubernatorial administration didn’t always yield results. In 1997, the governor made a phone call to then-Pennsylvania governor and now a member of the Bush cabinet, Tom Ridge, to push deregulation in that state.

“I very much appreciate your call to Tom Ridge a few days ago,” Lay wrote in an Oct. 17, 1997, letter. “I am certain that will have a positive impact on the way he and others in Pennsylvania view our proposal to provide cheaper electricity to consumers in Philadelphia as well as make it possible for open and fair competition at a much earlier date.” Ultimately, Ridge did not back the Enron proposal.

Similarly, the company’s methanol-producing plant on the Houston Ship Channel had a string of air pollution violations dating back to the early 1980s, when it had a different owner (Enron bought the plant from Tenneco in late 1991). Enron officials said they would obtain one of the voluntary pollution-reduction permits offered under a Bush-sponsored program launched in 1999. However, in 2001, when the Texas legislature moved to end the failed voluntary effort, Enron had yet to obtain a permit.

Energy policy

In 2001, while Vice President Cheney was formulating a national energy policy, Lay met with Cheney for 30 minutes. Lay gave Cheney an eight-point agenda that included arguments against price controls on wholesale electricity, according to a report in The Wall Street Journal, giving Enron and other companies unfettered access to the electricity transmission system and removing regulatory obstacles to building new generating plants and power lines. The Journal said the energy plan the administration unveiled in May last year reflected many of those same priorities.

A report prepared for Representative Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) by the minority staff of the Committee on Government Reform said at least 17 policies in the White House energy plan were advocated by Enron or would benefit Enron financially.

The Vice President’s office said the White House National Energy Policy Development Group, the task force that oversaw the energy policy, had met with Enron officials six times.

Enron had great access to the administration from its beginning. When the president was putting together his team, Enron lobbyist Ed Gillespie, of Quinn Gillespie & Associates, briefly served in the Commerce Department transition team. Gillespie, worked as acting director of public affairs for the Commerce Department for 15 days, helping Secretary Donald Evans recruit his staff, according to The Wall Street Journal. (His partner, Jack Quinn, served as White House counsel in the Clinton administration.)

In the early days of the Bush presidency, Enron spent at least $2.46 million on lobbying, records showed.

The Center revealed in January 2002 that 14 of the top 100 officials in the Bush administration had owned Enron stock.

Ties to the Clinton administration

Since 1990, Enron has given Democrats $1.5 million in hard and soft money contributions, roughly one fourth of the amount it gave to Republicans during the same period, according to CRP. Enron had privileged access to the Clinton administration as well. The company was one of the major beneficiaries of Clinton’s economic diplomacy, which promoted the interests of American businesses abroad. Most of the money that Enron received from OPIC and ExIm Bank was granted during the Clinton years.

Company executives regularly accompanied top administration officials on overseas trips, and lucrative business deals were signed on several such foreign visits.

As the Center reported in The Buying of the President (1996), Lay signed a contract for a 2,000 megawatt power plant in India worth an estimated $400 million while accompanying the late Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown on a trade mission to that country in January 1995. Enron also won a contract to build a $920 million power plant on the West coast of India and a $1.1 billion contract for offshore gas and oil production. The Dabhol project, which was worth $2.8 billion, ran into a series of roadblocks, and the local Indian utility, the sole customer, stopped payments in June 2001 following a dispute. Enron owned 65 percent of the project.

Cheney, Secretary of State Colin Powell and a series of other top Bush administration officials and diplomats reportedly lobbied Indian leaders to save Dabhol. OPIC documents released in January 2002 revealed that the National Security Council had intervened on behalf of Enron on the Dabhol issue.

In 1994, during a Brown mission to Russia, Rodney L. Gray, chairman and chief executive officer of Enron International, finalized a deal to develop a market for Russian gas in Europe. During the 1991-92 election cycle, when Brown served as the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Enron gave $28,525 to the Democratic party. (Enron gave $42,000 to the Democratic party in the 1993-94 cycle.)

During a trade trip to Bosnia and Croatia in July 1996, Brown’s successor, Mickey Kantor, helped a senior Enron official that accompanied the secretary clinch a deal to construct a $100 million power plant, the Boston Globe reported. Six days before the trip began, Enron made a $100,000 contribution to the Democratic National Committee.

An Enron executive was part of a team that accompanied Commerce Secretary William Daley to Africa from Nov. 30 to Dec. 7, 1998. In 1997, Enron officials were part of trade missions led by Energy Secretary Hazel R. O’Leary.

In 1998, when Brooksley Born, then chief of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, proposed regulating derivatives, Enron was one of a host of derivative users and underwriters who lobbied the Federal Reserve Board and the Treasury Department against it, The Wall Street Journal revealed in October last year. Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and Treasury chief Robert Rubin vehemently opposed the move.

Congress passed a moratorium on any new regulation of derivatives, and then toward the end of the administration’s term enacted legislation placing most of the derivatives outside the purview of regulation.

The creative use of derivatives was one of the means Enron used to keep debt off its books.

A most-favored corporation

Enron Corp. successfully lobbied— either alone or in conjunction with other companies — the federal government and state governments at least 49 times. Here is a list of the company’s successes.

Federal

Issue

Outcome

Elimination of natural

gas price control

President

George H.W. Bush signed the Natural Gas Wellhead Decontrol Act in 1989,

removing some key regulatory barriers, including the natural gas price

controls mandated by the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978.

Mojave pipeline

FERC gave

the project, a partnership of Enron and El Paso Natural Gas, its final

approval in May 1990.

Restructuring of

natural gas pipeline operations

The

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission restructured interstate pipeline

operations in April 1992. It separated sales and transportation services,

allowing customers to choose supply and transportation services from any

provider. The move paved the way for greater domestic exploration and

production.

Section 29 tax credit

for coal bed methane and tight-sands natural gas recovery

Tax

credit for non-conventional fuels production, under Section 29 of Internal

Revenue Code, was established in the Windfall Profit Tax Act. Wells dug in

1992 were eligible for the subsidy until this year. The credit, which

ultimately expired in 2002, was extended on several occasions by Congress

thanks in part to Enron’s lobbying.

Exemption from PUHCA

The SEC

exempted Enron from the Public Utility Holding Company Act, which bans

utilities from investing in unrelated, and potentially risky, businesses in

1993.

Open Access rulings

On April

24, 1996, FERC issued a pair of rules favorable to Enron. The open-access

rule forced utilities to unbundle generation and transmission services and

bring wholesale transmission transactions in an open-access transmission

tariff. The commission also ruled to facilitate the states’ restructuring of

the electric industry and allowed retail customers to choose service

providers.

Enron-PGC merger

 In

1997, FERC approved Enron’s merger with Portland General Corporation in

record time. According to Enron, it was the first merger approved by the

FERC since October 1994.

Exemption from

Investment Company Act of 1940

In 1997,

the SEC exempted Enron from provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940

which prohibit U.S. companies from leaving debt from overseas projects off

the books.

Congressional

moratorium on derivative regulation

A 1998

proposal by Brooksley Born, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission chief,

to regulate derivatives prompted hectic lobbying by Enron and other

derivative users and underwriters. The proposal, which was also opposed by

Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan and Treasury chief Robert Rubin, did not pass.

In fact, Congress passed a moratorium on derivative regulation.

Alternative minimum tax

Enron and others lobbied for the

repeal of the alternative minimum tax. The 1997 balanced-budget agreement

relaxed its rules, reducing the potential tax liability of companies that invest in new machinery.

I-69 highway

Enron

lobbied for the NAFTA highway, which would extend the existing

Canada-to-Indiana artery all the way to Texas and Mexico. Congress

authorized the project in 1997. Although the precise route through some

states has not been finalized, construction has begun in Mississippi.

Wind energy production

tax credit

Enron had

been one of the main beneficiaries of the federal wind energy production tax

credit, created in 1992. The subsidy has been extended every two years since

then.

Privatization of power

at military bases

A 1988

bill mandated the Defense Department to buy power from local utilities.

After the lobbying efforts by Enron and others, the Pentagon issued a

directive in 1998, to privatize base utilities. In 1999, Enron clinched a

10-year, $25 million deal to supply energy to Fort Hamilton, N.Y.

African Growth and

Opportunity Act

The bill,

signed by President Clinton in May 2000, sets condition for new aid and

trade benefits to African states. Among the conditions are opening up their

economies to foreign businesses.

Increase in the limit

of H-1B visa for workers from foreign countries

In

October 2000, Congress approved a bill that raised the limit of the

temporary visa from 115,000 to 195,000. Lay had personally lobbied Congress

on the issue.

FERC Order 637

The

order, issued in 2000, further deregulated natural gas distribution, by

refining the remaining pipeline regulations. One of the effects of the order

was the development of a market for natural gas commodity trades.

Commodity Futures

Modernization Act of 2000

The

legislation had a provision precluding the Commodity Futures Trading

Commission from regulating Enron’s trading in energy derivatives; this made

permanent the moratorium Congress had passed in 1998.

 

Deregulation in States

 

Issue

Outcome

Arizona

The state

passed the restructuring legislation in May 1998. The Arizona Corporation

Commission, which is responsible for regulating utilities, has opened

utility territories to competition and granted certificates to several

providers. (In early 1999, Enron applied for clearance to sell electricity

in the state.)

California

California enacted a deregulation bill in 1996. Enron signed contracts with

industrial and other customers worth millions of dollars. It suspended the

restructuring activities in September 2001, following the power crisis.

Connecticut

The

restructuring legislation was signed into law on April 29, 1998. Enron had

lobbied on the issue. (According to the Associated Press, nearly three years

after Connecticut deregulated its power market, approximately 21,000

residential electric customers have switched from the two utilities in the

state.)

Delaware

The

Electric Utility Restructuring Act was enacted in March 1999.

District of Columbia

A

regulatory order to restructure power market was issued in September 2000.

Illinois

Illinois

inaugurated an eight-year deregulation and restructuring process in 1997.

Maine

Legislation to restructure electricity market was passed in 1997.

Maryland

Maryland

legislators passed utility deregulation legislation in April 1999

Massachusetts

The

Massachusetts legislature passed its deregulation law in November 1997 and

the state started competition in March 1998.

Michigan

The state

took concrete steps toward deregulating power market in June 2000 and two

deregulation bills were signed into law in June 2001

New Hampshire

Beginning

in May 1996, New Hampshire took a series of legislative and regulatory steps

to restructure its power market. Enron, which had lobbied for deregulation

in the state, won a pilot project.

New Jersey

New

Jersey passed deregulation legislation in 1999.

New York

New York

Public Service Commission issued a restructuring order in May 1996. Orders

for restructuring six state utilities were approved in 1997 and 1998.

Ohio

Ohio’s

legislature passed deregulation legislation in 1999. It allowed consumers to

choose their supplier of electricity beginning 2001.

Oregon

Oregon

passed its first deregulation measure in 1999. Enron owns Oregon’s largest

utility, PGE, which is the company’s largest asset.

Pennsylvania

The

state’s deregulation bill was passed in 1996. Enron and PECO, the local

utility, quibbled over competing deregulation plans; the PECO-favored plan

was ultimately adopted, although Pennsylvania deregulation did allow Enron

to enter the market.

Rhode Island

Rhode

Island was one of the first states to restructure its power market. Governor

Lincoln Almond signed the restructuring law On Aug. 7, 1996. Breaking ranks

with other independents and marketers, Enron backed the legislation.

Texas

The Texas

deregulation bill favored incumbent utilities over outsiders, but did expand

Enron’s opportunities in the state. The law took effect in January this

year. Among the first companies to enter the retail market was New Power

Co., an Enron spinoff that declared bankruptcy in June.

Virginia

Virginia

enacted restructuring legislation in 1999. Competition in power supply began

in January this year.

Arkansas

The state

enacted its first deregulation bill in April 1999. The restructuring will

not start before October 2003, according to the Energy Information

Administration.

Montana

Though

Montana passed legislation in May 1997, the process will not start until

July 2004.

Nevada

Beginning

in 1997, Nevada legislators and regulators took a series of steps toward

deregulation. Later they suspended part of the process.

New Mexico

The state

legislature passed a deregulation law in 1999, but in March 2001 delayed it

until July 2008.

Oklahoma

In 1997,

Oklahoma enacted a law calling for deregulation by July 1, 2002. A bill in

May 2001 delayed the deregulation process indefinitely.

 

Other Favors in States

 

Issue

Outcome

Cut in gas production

In 1992,

when the gas prices fell, the Texas Railroad Commission, which regulates oil

and natural gas in the state, set limits on natural gas production. Enron

and other gas companies lobbied for the production cuts.

Texas Environmental

Health and Safety Audit Privilege Act

The 1995

legislation, which was dubbed the polluter immune legislation by critics,

allowed companies to police themselves. When companies violate state

environmental laws, they do not have to make that information public. Enron

Methanol was a major beneficiary.

Tort reform in Texas

Texas

implemented a series of tort reform measures in the mid-1990s, under the

watch of then-Governor George W. Bush. Enron and other corporations had been

lobbying for such legislation to restrict lawsuit for years.

Corporate tax

reduction

The 1999

Tax legislation signed by Bush reduced corporate taxes as well as sales and

property taxes. Enron lobbied for the measure.

 

International

 

Issue

OutcomeDhabol Power Project (India)

Several

Clinton administration officials helped Enron clinch the $2.8 billion

project, and later intervened several times on Enron’s behalf to keep the

controversial and ill-fated project alive. The intervention was continued by

the Bush administration.

Mozambique pipeline

In 1995,

the Clinton administration, U.S. diplomats and some legislators reportedly

played a key role in Enron getting a natural gas development and pipeline

project in Mozambique.

Re-bidding for a power

plant in the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands

After

Enron lost out to a Japanese company in the first bidding, the U.S. energy

giant sought Tom DeLay’s help to reopen the competition. The bid was

re-opened in 1999.

Normalization of trade

ties with Vietnam

A top

Enron official told a congressional panel the company wanted EXIM Bank and

OPIC to be granted authority to fund projects in Vietnam. The Clinton

administration normalized trade relations with Vietnam in 1999.

Enron Corp. hired at least 28 former government officials to work for it either

as employees, officers, directors, consultants or lobbyists.

Individual

Position at Enron

Position in government

J. Bennett Johnston

Consultant/lobbyist

Former

U.S. Senator. He chaired the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

Robert Mosbacher

Consultant and joint venture partner

Former

Commerce Secretary

Brent Scowcroft

Director

of Global Power and Pipelines, an Enron subsidiary with interests abroad.

National

Security Adviser to former President George H. W. Bush

Marc Racicot

Lobbyist

Former

Montana governor and current chairman of the Republican National Committee

Wendy

Gramm

Member of

Enron’s board of directors

Head of

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Linda

Robertson

Headed

Enron’s Washington office

Clinton

administration Treasury official

Elizabeth

Moler

Lobbyist

Chair of

the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Charles

E. Walker

Director

Former

deputy secretary of the U.S. Treasury

Thomas

“Mack” McLarty

Briefly

worked for Enron

White

House chief of staff

Frank

Wisner

Served on

the board of an Enron subsidiary after returning from India

U.S.

ambassador to India

Mike

Andrews

Lobbyist

Former

Democratic member of Congress from Texas

Ed

Bethune

Lobbyist

on deregulation

Former

Republican member of Congress from Arkansas

Ed

Gillespie

Lobbyist

Former

communications director at the RNC and a top communications advisor to Bush

during the campaign

Gene E.

Godley

Lobbyist

Assistant

Secretary of the Treasury in the Carter administration

Greg

Simon

Lobbyist

Media and

telecommunications adviser to former Vice President Al Gore

Ken

Raisler

Lobbyist

Former

general counsel of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission

Edwin A.

Buckham

Lobbyist

Former

chief of staff to House Majority Whip Tom DeLay, R-Texas

Michael Lewan

Lobbyist

Chief of

staff to Senator Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) from 1989-92

Enron joined at least 28 separate coalitions that lobbied in Washington or state capitols on various issues. Enron is no longer active in many of these groups; others, having succeeded or failed in their efforts to affect legislation, were disbanded.

  • African Growth and Opportunity Act Coalition

A corporate coalition that lobbied on the African Growth and Opportunity Act. Chevron, Mobil, Exxon, Enron, Bank of America, the Gap, Texaco, Amoco, Citicorp, and Coca-Cola were members.

  • Alliance for Capital Access

The Alliance represented about 50 companies, including Enron, and lobbied Congress on the regulation of junk bonds high interest corporate debt. Kinder-Care Learning Centers and Manor Care were among the other members.

  • Alliance for Lower Electric Rates Today (ALERT)

The coalition, representing groups of residential and business consumers, was formed in 1996 to fight for deregulation of the power generation industry. It was active in several states, including Louisiana, Arkansas, Florida and Virginia.

  • American Council for Capital Formation

The Council’s goal is to restructure U.S. tax, regulatory, and environmental policies in a manner that is favorable to capital-intensive industries. Ken Lay was a member of the board of directors. Former Treasury chief and Enron lobbyist Lloyd Bentsen and former Senator William E. Brock, were also on the board. Former Cabinet members Lloyd Bentsen (also an Enron lobbyist), William E. Brock, George P. Shultz, and former Federal Reserve chairman Paul A. Volcker were also on the board.

  • American Institute for International Steel

AIIS is a Washington-based trade group of steel importers. It has lobbied on steel tariffs.

  • American Legislative Exchange Council

ALEC, a group of state lawmakers and policy advocates that champions small government and free market ideas, supported a deregulation plan similar to the one Enron advocated. In 1997, Lay spoke at the council’s 24th annual meeting in New Orleans. Enron was one of the financial backers of the council.

  • Americans for Affordable Electricity

Enron was a member of this lobbying coalition of power consumers, producers and marketers that lobbied for deregulation. Former Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Chairman Elizabeth Moler, who was with the Washington law firm Vinson & Elkins, lobbied for the group. According to Electric USA, a group that lobbied against deregulation, Enron provided as much as 75% of the puppet coalition’s funding. Other Members included Exxon Corporation, Kmart Corporation and Koch Industries.

  • Americans for Fair Taxation

This group wants to replace the federal income tax system with a national sales tax on the final purchase of new goods and services. Enron was one of the financial backers of the group.

  • Business Council for a Sustainable Energy

The Business Council for Sustainable Energy consists of energy companies and trade associations. According to its web site, the Council supports policies and programs that increase energy efficiency, accelerate the development of renewable energy resources and promote greater use of natural gas. Its current members include Honeywell, the Maytag Alliance to Save Energy and the American Wind Energy Association.

  • Citizens for a Sound Economy

A think tank that advocates for less government oversight of the private sector, lower taxes and limited government. It lobbied on utility deregulation. Enron funded CSE studies.

  • Coalition for Competitive Energy Markets

A coalition of power marketers that advocated utility deregulation. Its members included Coastal Electric Services, Destec/Dow Chemical, Electric Clearinghouse, Equitable Resources, and Valero Energy, as well as Enron Power Marketing.

  • Coalition for Gas-based Environmental Solutions

A group of gas producers, pipeline operators and distributors that favors environmental regulations that would promote the use of natural gas over coal and other energy sources. Other members included Consolidated Natural Gas Co., Amoco Production Co., ANR Pipeline Co., ARCO Oil and Gas Co., Chevron Corp., Tenneco Gas and TransCanada PipeLines Ltd. John Palmisano was named executive director of the Coalition in 1995, while employed as Enron’s director of environmental policy.

  • Competitive Power Coalition

A New England coalition of independent power producers, co-generators and power marketers that worked with Enron on deregulation. Enron left the coalition when its interests diverged from the other companies.

  • Direct Access Alliance

A coalition of energy service providers, marketers, and large power consumers that negotiated with California’s three largest electric utilities and lobbied the California Public Utilities Commission to adopt a single statewide tariff for direct-access customers. It had some 30 members including the University of California, PG&E Energy Services and Enron Corp.

  • DOD Competition Coalition

A group of independent power and renewable energy producers, industrial end-users, natural gas industry associations and some utilities that advocated privatization of power supply in military bases. Among its other members were Geothermal Energy Association, California Energy Co., National Taxpayers Union, Citizens for a Sound Economy, American Forest and Paper Association, Elcon, Destec, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, NGSA, UtiliCorp United and Wisconsin Electric Power Co.

  • Electric Power Supply Association

A trade association that represents competitive power suppliers, including independent power producers, merchant generators and power marketers. It advocates a competitive electric power supply marketplace, to be achieved through utility deregulation.

  • Emissions Marketing Association

Formed by a group of energy companies, including Enron, the group’s goal was to promote market-based solutions for curbing state and regional air pollution problems. It also lobbies for the development of markets for trading emissions credits. Other members included Duke Power Co. and Wisconsin Electric Co.

  • Energy Group

A coalition of energy companies that lobbied on legislation to reauthorize the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Among its members were BP Amoco, J. Aron & Co., Koch Industries, Mobil Business Resources Corp., Phibro, and Sempra Energy Trading Corp., as well as Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp.

  • International Climate Change Partnership

A worldwide coalition of companies and trade associations from the industrialized world that aims to play a role in the international policy process on climate change. Its members include Boeing, General Electric, AT&T, Halliburton, Allied Signal, Dow Chemical, 3M, Dupont and Electrolux.

  • International Energy Development Council

A coalition of banks, construction companies and electric power utilities with interests in private power projects overseas. Among its members are Bank of America, Bechtel Enterprises Inc., Black & Veatch Power Development, Chase Manhattan Bank, Citicorp N.A., Coastal Power Corp. and Cogen Technologies.

  • Interstate Natural Gas Association of America

A trade organization of the natural gas pipeline industry in North America that represents most of the interstate natural gas transmission pipeline companies operating on the continent.

  • Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association

A coalition of wholesale energy marketers, generation companies, and retail electricity suppliers that wanted to play a role in the deregulation processes in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland. Other members included the retail divisions of Consolidated Natural Gas Co., the now bankrupt PG&E Corp., Green Mountain Power Corp., and of Shell Oil Co.

  • National Wetlands Coalition

A corporate coalition that has lobbied against the Wetland Protection Program and advocated changes to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the primary federal program regulating activities in wetlands. Other members included Amoco, Arco, BP America, Conoco, Exxon, Fina, Freeport-McMoran, Hunt Oil, Kerr-McGee, Marathon, Mobil, Occidental, ODECO, Oryx, Panhandle Eastern, Phillips, and Shell.

  • New York Energy Providers Association

An energy coalition formed to promote and intervene in the deregulation process in New York. Other members included the retail divisions of Consolidated Natural Gas Co., the now bankrupt PG&E Corp., Green Mountain Power Corp., and of Shell Oil Co.

  • Oxygenated Fuels Association

A global trade group that promotes the use of oxygenated fuel additives to improve the combustion performance of gasoline. Among members were Texaco, El Paso Corp Merchant Energy, and Qatar Fuel Additives Co., as well as Enron Clean Fuels Company.

  • Pew Center on Global Climate Change

The Center’s Business Environmental Leadership Council is composed of corporations that have similar positions on global warming. Members include Toyota, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Sunoco, and BP Amoco. The Center on Global Climate Change is financed by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

  • Power Trading Council

A group of power marketers and large industrial power consumers who joined together to fight transmission system rules. It argued that a 1996 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission order that mandated utilities to open up power lines had several loopholes that nullified the order’s intent.

  • Texas Renewable Power Coalition

A group of wind companies that promoted renewable energy. Members included FPL Energy, Inc. and American National Power, as well as Enron Wind Corp.