
JOURNALISTIC ETHICS
The Center for Public Integrity subscribes to the Code of Ethics of the Society of Professional journalists, reprinted here in full:
Preamble
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist’s credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society’s principles and standards of practice.
Seek Truth and Report It
Journalists should be honest, fair and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information. Journalists should:
Minimize Harm
Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect. Journalists should:
Act Independently
Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know. Journalists should:
Be Accountable
Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other. Journalists should:
Sigma Delta Chi’s first Code of Ethics was borrowed from the American Society of Newspaper Editors in 1926. In 1973, Sigma Delta Chi wrote its own code, which was revised in 1984 and 1987. The present version of the Society of Professional Journalists’ Code of Ethics was adopted in September 1996.
DATA ACCURACY
To ensure data accuracy and the integrity of the process, the following mandatory steps are required of all Center staff for all projects and stories that we publish. We believe they are absolutely necessary and will be enforced.
1. Anyone working on a story or project involving a database will consult the data editor and editorial director about methods and plans before any data are gathered or input.
2. The data editor, in conjunction with the project coordinator or director, will design a plan to check the data according to agreed upon methods once data are gathered.
3. A Center staffer not involved in any phase of the story will have autonomy in fact-checking.
4. Databases entered by the Center staff or other nongovernmental entity are not to be treated as primary source documents. We believe there is no substitute for reviewing actual documents and comparing them against the electronic database.
5. Fact-checking documents will include print-outs of the source documents (even when those documents are entered in a database) unless there are more than 200 source documents or records in the database. In such cases the data editor and the lead fact-checker will consult about a suitable alternative to facilitate fact-checking.
6. All outlying statistics (those that are more than 50 percent higher or lower than the next nearest figure in a grouping) will be checked by hand against source documents by a staffer not on the story team.
7. All listed rankings will be compared against source documents. All ranked parties listed or mentioned will be contacted for quality assurance verification, though not necessarily for comment.
8. Databases will be reviewed line by line by a staffer not involved in entry of or reporting on the data. Again, in cases of databases larger than 200 documents or records, the data editor will consult with the project director about a suitable alternative.
9. The copy editor will verify with the data editor and editorial director that steps 5-8 have been completed for each statistic used in a Center story and that they document their verification of data for inclusion in the fact-checking files.
10. Only the editorial director or managing editor will tell the web team when a Center story is ready for online publication. No story will be shared or promised to be delivered at a specific time before final edits from the editorial director or managing editor have been made and the copy editor has signed off on the story.
11. When the copy editor, fact checker, or data editor is sick, on vacation, or out of the office, their duties will be undertaken only by those who have been trained and briefed by them to do so.
12. Any variation from this protocol must be approved by the editorial director in conjunction with the executive director.

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter and get the latest from our in-depth investigations, articles, interviews, blogs, videos, and more.

Your support will help us bring you more investigations, articles, interviews and news related materials relevant to U.S. politics and politics abroad.

The Center for Public Integrity is dedicated to producing original, responsible investigative journalism on issues of public concern in the USA and around the world.

The Center’s International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is a collaboration of some of the world’s leading investigative reporters. ICIJ extends globally the Center’s style of watchdog journalism, working with 100 reporters in 50 countries to produce long-term, transnational projects.