Watchdogs

Michigan

By The Center for Public Integrity

Michigan is among four states - including North Dakota, South Dakota and Vermont - in which there are no formal ethics laws dealing with ethical conduct of legislator beyond personal financial disclosure and/or campaign finance disclosure requirements. Michigan is also among seven states — including Indiana, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina — in which an outside agency is setup to oversee other divisions of government.

More Info

What, if any, ethics agency exists in the state?

Michigan has the Michigan State Board of Ethics, which is enabled by the Michigan Compiled Laws 15.341 - 15.348. The board does not have jurisdiction over state legislators, members of the judicial branch or elected persons in the executive branch. It oversees employees, classified and unclassified, of the executive branch of state government. It also oversees public officers appointed by the Governor and other executive department officials.
http://www.state.mi.us/mdcs/ethicsboard.htm

If the above agency does not oversee legislators, is legislative oversight defined in statute?

No.

Are there state statutes that address ethical conduct for legislators?

No. Michigan has no statute regarding ethics and disclosure beyond sections pertaining candidates' campaign finance disclosure, which is governed by the Michigan Department of State, Bureau of Elections.
http://www.sos.state.mi.us/election/elect.html

Watchdogs

Idaho

By The Center for Public Integrity

Idaho is one of 27 states in which no outside agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 8 of those states where any outside oversight for members of the legislature is lumped in with the responsibilities of the secretary of state or attorney general.

More Info

What, if any, ethics agency exists in the state?

None.

If the above agency does not oversee legislators, is legislative oversight defined in statute?

No.

Are there state statutes that address ethical conduct for legislators?

Yes. Idaho Statutes Title 59, Chapter 7, "Ethics in Government" applies to legislators. Also, Idaho Statutes s.18-1351 et seq., dealing with bribery, and ss.67-5726 and 59-201, dealing with government contracts, apply to legislators.
http://www3.state.id.us/idstat/TOC/59007KTOC.html
http://www3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=180130051.K
http://www3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=670570026.K
http://www3.state.id.us/cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=590020001.K

When were the ethics statutes enacted?
1990

Where do legislators file outside interest disclosures?
No disclosure required. See Info Resources.

Watchdogs

Washington

By The Center for Public Integrity

Washington is one of 27 states in which no outside agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 9 of those states where an outside ethics agency does oversee disclosure for members of the legislature, in this case both personal financial disclosure and campaign finance disclosure.

Washington is among the 22 states that established outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements of legislators in the post-Watergate 1970s.

Of the 32 states that have outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements for legislators — 23 that cover ethics and disclosure, plus nine that cover disclosure only -Washington is one of 17 where the legislature has some involvement in choosing commission members. Only three states — California, Hawaii and Massachusetts — have members picked without the input of the legislature.

Budget

Washington is among 22 states that did approve a budget for its ethics agency exceeding the rate of inflation, or 7 percent, between 1997 and 2000. Those states include Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Tennessee, Washington and Wisconsin. Six state ethics agency budgets — in Arkansas, Georgia, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey and Washington — at least doubled during this time period.

Investigation

Of the 32 two states with outside ethics and/or disclosure oversight, only two ethics agencies — in Florida and West Virginia — cannot initiate an investigation or investigate an anonymous complaint. Only one agency, Alabama's, cannot issue subpoenas.

Watchdogs

North Carolina

By The Center for Public Integrity

North Carolina is one of 27 states in which no outside agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 18 of those states where no ethics agency oversees any aspect of disclosure. North Carolina is among seven of those states — including Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio and South Carolina — in which an outside agency is setup to oversee other divisions of government.

More Info

What, if any, ethics agency exists in the state?

North Carolina has the North Carolina Board of Ethics, which is authorized under Executive Order 127, as amended by Executive Order 131. The board administers a personal economic disclosure program covering employees and appointees of the Executive Branch, including state agencies under the jurisdiction of the Governor.
Jurisdiction does not extend to legislators.
http://www.doa.state.nc.us/doa/ethics/

If the above agency does not oversee legislators, is legislative oversight defined in statute?

Yes. North Carolina also has the Legislative Ethics Committee, which is enabled by the NC General Statute Chapter 120, Article 14, Part 3 (120-99). The committee is made up of ten members — five senators and five house members.
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/statutes/generalstatutes/html/bychapter/chapter%5F120.html

Watchdogs

Wisconsin

By The Center for Public Integrity

Wisconsin is one of 23 states in which an outside ethics agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 13 of those states where the ethics agency also oversees personal financial disclosure for members of the legislature.

Wisconsin is among the 22 states that established outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements of legislators in the post-Watergate 1970s.

Of the 32 states that have outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements for legislators — 23 that cover ethics and disclosure, plus nine that cover disclosure only — Wisconsin is one of 17 where the legislature has some involvement in choosing commission members. Only three states — California, Hawaii and Massachusetts — have members picked without the input of the legislature.

Budget

Wisconsin is among 22 states that did approve a budget for its ethics agency exceeding the rate of inflation, or 7 percent, between 1997 and 2000. Those states include Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Tennessee, Washington and Wisconsin. Six state ethics agency budgets — in Arkansas, Georgia, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey and Washington — at least doubled during this time period.

Watchdogs

Arkansas

By The Center for Public Integrity

Arkansas is one of 23 states in which an outside ethics agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 10 of those states where the ethics agency also oversees both personal financial disclosure and campaign finance disclosure for members of the legislature.

Arkansas is one of 9 states that waited until the 1980s or the 1990s to established outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements of legislators.

Of the 32 states that have outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements for legislators — 23 that cover ethics and disclosure, plus nine that cover disclosure only — Arkansas is one of 12 where the legislature appoints at least one commission member. Only three states — California, Hawaii and Massachusetts — have members picked without the input of the legislature.

Budget

Arkansas is among 22 states that did approve a budget for its ethics agency exceeding the rate of inflation, or 7 percent, between 1997 and 2000. Those states include Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Tennessee, Washington and Wisconsin. Six state ethics agency budgets — in Arkansas, Georgia, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey and Washington — at least doubled during this time period.

Watchdogs

Indiana

By The Center for Public Integrity

Indiana is one of 27 states in which no outside agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 18 of those states where no ethics agency oversees any aspect of disclosure. Indiana is among seven of those states — including Illinois, Michigan, New York, North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina — in which an outside agency is setup to oversee other divisions of government.

More Info

What, if any, ethics agency exists in the state?

Indiana has the Indiana State Ethics Commission, which is enabled in the Indiana Code 4-2-6. The commission does not have jurisdiction over state legislators. It oversees current or former "state officers," meaning the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the secretary of state. It also oversees current or former employees, persons who have or had a business relationship with an agency and special state appointees.
http://www.state.in.us/ethics/

If the above agency does not oversee legislators, is legislative oversight defined in statute?

Yes. Indiana also has the House Legislative Ethics Committee and the Senate Legislative Ethics Committee, which are enabled by Indiana Code 2-2.1-3-5. Each committee is made up of six members, three from the majority party and three from the minority party that has the largest number of members.
http://www.ai.org/legislative/ic/code/title2/ar2.1/ch3.html

Watchdogs

Mississippi

By The Center for Public Integrity

Mississippi is one of 23 states in which an outside ethics agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 13 of those states where the ethics agency also oversees personal financial disclosure for members of the legislature.

Mississippi is among the 22 states that established outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements of legislators in the post-Watergate 1970s.

Of the 32 states that have outside oversight of ethical conduct and/or disclosure requirements for legislators — 23 that cover ethics and disclosure, plus nine that cover disclosure only — Mississippi is one of 12 where the legislature appoints at least one commission member. Only three states - California, Hawaii and Massachusetts — have members picked without the input of the legislature.

Budget

Mississippi is among 22 states that did approve a budget for its ethics agency exceeding the rate of inflation, or 7 percent, between 1997 and 2000. Those states include Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Texas, Tennessee, Washington and Wisconsin. Six state ethics agency budgets — in Arkansas, Georgia, Maine, Nevada, New Jersey and Washington — at least doubled during this time period.

Watchdogs

Colorado

By The Center for Public Integrity

Colorado is one of 27 states in which no outside agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 8 of those states where any outside oversight for members of the legislature is lumped in with the responsibilities of the secretary of state or attorney general.

More Info

What, if any, ethics agency exists in the state?

None.

If the above agency does not oversee legislators, is legislative oversight defined in statute?

Yes. Colorado has a board of ethics for the General Assembly, enabled by Colorado Revised Statutes s.24-18-113. The board consists of four legislative members. This board is not an ongoing or standing committee or board. The statute provides the ability for the board to be formed as needed.
http://64.78.178.125/cgi-dos/statdspp.exe?LNP&doc=24-18-113

Are there state statutes that address ethical conduct for legislators?

Yes. Colorado Revised Statutes, Title 24, Article 18, "Standards of Conduct" applies to legislators.
http://64.78.178.125/cgi-dos/stattocp.exe?P&ttl=24&art=18

When were the ethics statutes enacted?

1988

Where do legislators file outside interest disclosures?

Colorado Secretary of State. See Info Resources.

Watchdogs

Ohio

By The Center for Public Integrity

Ohio is one of 27 states in which no outside agency oversees ethical conduct of state legislators. It is one of 18 of those states where no ethics agency oversees any aspect of disclosure. Ohio is among seven of those states - including Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, New York, North Carolina and South Carolina — in which an outside agency is setup to oversee other divisions of government.

More Info

What, if any, ethics agency exists in the state?

Ohio has the Ohio Ethics Commission, which is enabled in Ohio Revised Code Title 1, Section 102.05. The commission does not have jurisdiction over state legislators, legislative employees, judges and judicial employees. It oversees the law for all other public officials and employees.
http://onlinedocs.andersonpublishing.com/revisedcode/home3.cfm?GRDescription1=revised%20code&GRDescription2=title%201&GRDescription3=&TextField=%3CJD%3A%22102%22%3ECHAPTER%20102%3A%20PUBLIC%20OFFICERS%20%2D%2D%20ETHICS&GRStructure1=102&GRStructure2=

Pages