The Center for Public Integrity

PaperTrail BlogPaper Trail Blog

RSS Feed

image Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell On the eve of a protest planned for March 2, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid have offered new support to environmentalists hoping to force the Capitol Power Plant to abandon coal entirely. But the move could still face some important obstacles.

The plant, located a few blocks from the U.S. Capitol, provides heating and cooling for the Capitol, the Supreme Court, the Library of Congress, and various other buildings. While much of the fuel burned by the plant is natural gas, nearly half of it is coal. A 2000 attempt to change the facility to other fuel sources stalled after Democratic Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia and Republican Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky wrote to the Architect of the Capitol to request that the upgrade be delayed until coal had received full consideration.

In a new letter to the Architect of the Capitol, Reid and Pelosi expressed a desire to find funding to retrofit the plant, if necessary, so it could operate just on natural gas. A protest at the plant is scheduled for March 2, and organizers are hoping for as many as 2,500 people.

McConnell had no immediate reaction. A statement from Byrd said he supported Reid and Pelosi’s suggestions that the Capitol architect explore ways to retrofit the plant. Byrd said that he’d been a “supporter” of coal at the plant and that it was “regrettable” that there had not been more investment in clean coal technologies. He urged Congressional leadership to aggressively support “additional efforts” to develop clean coal technology.

imageWest Virginia Sen. Robert Byrd

The coal for the plant is provided by International Resources Inc. and Kanawha Eagle mine, part of Peabody Energy.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Byrd has received at least $172,661 from campaign contributors in the mining industry, including at least $2,000 from donors at Peabody Energy.

McConnell has received at least $607,799 including at least $2,000 from International and $81,600 from Peabody.

Neither company has made any reported contributed to Reid or Pelosi.

Comments (1) | Add a comment Print this





  • Please enter the word you see in the image below:

  • Facebook

Comments

  1. Posted by: hsr0601 on March 01, 2009, 2:51 pm

    Down the road, buildings also can become power plants, which leads them to being both self-sufficient and profitable via selling surplus, and those are what the power companies fear as this can reduce electricity cost considerably in the region as well, better still, it can give a building industry a boost at the same time, according to the research.
    With the promsing digital revolution, smart grid, the controversial, unpopular clean coal, nuclea energy issues are not so sigtnificant any longer, I think.

Add a comment

Do you have an opinion about this post?
Log in / Register to become part of the conversation!

Stay Connected

Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter and get the latest from our in-depth investigations, articles, interviews, blogs, videos, and more.

Support the Center

Your support will help us bring you more investigations, articles, interviews and news related materials relevant to U.S. politics and politics abroad.

Donate

About the Center

The Center for Public Integrity is dedicated to producing original, responsible investigative journalism on issues of public concern in the USA and around the world.

More about the Center

International Consortium of Investigative Journalists

The Center’s International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is a collaboration of some of the world’s leading investigative reporters. ICIJ extends globally the Center’s style of watchdog journalism, working with 100 reporters in 50 countries to produce long-term, transnational projects.

ICIJ website