Copenhagen — ICIJ reporting team Kate Willson and Andrew Green will be in Copenhagen as part of our continuing investigation into the influences behind the UN climate talks. We’ll talk to industry representatives about what they want, how they interact with policy makers, and what kind of impact they are having.
Washington — Other nations complain that the United States, despite President Obama’s pledge of leadership, has not made the commitment to address climate change that is needed from the country that over time has contributed the most to the greenhouse gas burden now in the atmosphere. His international negotiators have worked to lower expectations for what the world can expect from a nation where coal-fired, energy-gobbling industries dominate the political scene and there are five climate lobbyists for every member of Congress.
Washington — President Obama said at Copenhagen that the United States is committed to action on global warming, but the domestic politics are only growing "curiouser and curiouser," as Alice might say from Wonderland. A close look at the 140 interests that jumped into the debate for the first time in the third quarter shows a marked trend: Companies and organizations which feel they've been overlooked are fighting for a place at the table. Among them: soup makers and venture capitalists.
Tokyo — For almost five decades, Japan’s Nippon Keidanren and other powerful business associations have lavished funds on the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party, and had plenty of say in how environmental policies were set. But times have changed, and industry is now struggling to be heard by the recently elected government led by the Democratic Party of Japan. The new ruling coalition has banned industry from its climate policy task force and called for a major new carbon tax.
Copenhagen — Intensive lobbying by carbon-intensive industries could make it hard for the EU to meet its ambitious climate goals. Member governments were “lobbied like hell,” according to a senior European Parliament member, and environmental experts fear that some of the concessions industry got — such as allowing up to 50 percent of all emissions reductions to be met through foreign “offset” projects — may undermine the effectiveness of the EU agreement.
Copenhagen — Capturing and storing carbon dioxide from power stations and other industrial plants is seen as the solution to controlling CO2 — at least according to companies like Shell and BP, who have an obvious interest, as well as some leading climate change experts.
Montreal — Legions of industry lobbyists representing big greenhouse gas emitters have worked to weaken climate change legislation in Canada. Oil and gas producers comprised the largest group through August 2009, but mining and coal companies have also lobbies on climate change. In the meantime, Canada has failed to meet its Kyoto Protocol commitments, while its emissions — a third of which come from the oil-rich province of Alberta — have risen 26 percent from 1990 levels.
New Delhi — Indian officials and industry leaders seem of one mind over how to move the booming Indian economy forward, and that has meant a low priority for combating climate change. India is now the world’s fifth largest emitter of greenhouse gases, and officials in Delhi say they want to be “a dealmaker not a deal breaker” in Copenhagen. But government policies intended to slow global warming are being implemented slowly or not at all.
Brasília — Even though Brazil’s carbon emissions are low compared to those of the United States or China, the country plays a key role in global warming as home to the largest expanse of Amazon rain forest: About 55 percent of the country’s emissions are now due to deforestation. Agribusinesses and their political allies have balked at proposed environmental controls, and argue that Brazil should not rush to act on global warming until wealthier countries offer their plans.
Beijing — Although China is now the world’s top greenhouse gas producer, it leaders insist that Western countries, which contributed the bulk of carbon emissions, bear primary responsibility for a solution. Even within China’s one-party system, businesses vie for influence on climate policy. And the battle now being played out will have profound consequences for the effort to address global warming.
Sydney — Scores of interests have fought over the last year to “brown down” Australia’s first comprehensive plan to cut its greenhouse gas emissions. Although the hot and dry continent faces severe peril due to climate change, industries that rely on cheap coal power have used the threat of economic risk to fight Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s effort to address global warming.


December 27, 2009, 8:00 pm
Washington — The Climate Lobby from Soup to Nuts
December 23, 2009, 8:00 am
Washington — A Global Lack of Transparency
December 18, 2009, 12:44 pm
Meet the BINGOs
December 15, 2009, 1:08 pm
Meet the Lobbies: Carbon Traders
December 11, 2009, 4:54 am
Meet the Lobbies: Oil and Coal
December 10, 2009, 2:03 am
Meet the Lobbies: Agriculture
December 10, 2009, 1:01 am
Tokyo — Industry Targets Tokyo’s Ambitious New Climate Goals
December 09, 2009, 10:15 am
Meet the Lobbies: Electricity and Gas
December 08, 2009, 12:01 am
Copenhagen — The EU’s Billion-Euro Bet
December 07, 2009, 5:01 pm
Alternative Energy Voices Fight To Be Heard at Copenhagen
December 07, 2009, 12:01 am
Copenhagen — European Ambitions Hit a Wall of Carbon
December 04, 2009, 11:00 am
The Climate Lobby at Copenhagen
December 04, 2009, 12:01 am
Montreal — Canada’s About-Face on Climate
November 23, 2009, 1:01 am
New Delhi — India Struggles To Confront Climate Change
November 16, 2009, 1:06 am
Brasília — Caught Between Competing Interests in Brazil
November 12, 2009, 7:00 am
Beijing — A Climate Dilemma for China
November 10, 2009, 1:00 am
Bangkok — BINGOs and the Global Lobbyist
November 09, 2009, 1:01 am
Washington — A Case of Lowered Expectations
November 06, 2009, 7:00 am
Sydney — “Brown Down” in Australia
November 05, 2009, 12:01 am
Key Findings
November 05, 2009, 12:01 am
Washington — Toward a Stalemate in Copenhagen


Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter and get the latest from our in-depth investigations, articles, interviews, blogs, videos, and more.

Your support will help us bring you more investigations, articles, interviews and news related materials relevant to U.S. politics and politics abroad.

The Center for Public Integrity is dedicated to producing original, responsible investigative journalism on issues of public concern in the USA and around the world.

The Center’s International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) is a collaboration of some of the world’s leading investigative reporters. ICIJ extends globally the Center’s style of watchdog journalism, working with 100 reporters in 50 countries to produce long-term, transnational projects.