Key Findings

  • In 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency was poised to cite evidence of cancer risks in hexavalent chromium, a chemical compound found in tap water – likely presaging stricter drinking water standards. 
  • Yet a special EPA panel urged the agency to delay action – citing, among other issues, pending research by the American Chemistry Council, a trade association. The EPA agreed to put off action. 
  • Three of the EPA panelists urging delay had worked on behalf of PG&E, a California power company accused of polluting waters with hexavalent chromium, The Center for Public Integrity found. 
  • The EPA panelists were selected by a private company under contract with the agency. Under its own rules, the EPA does not see conflict of interest forms filed by prospective panelists – potentially leaving it in the dark. 
  • As she leaves office, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson is pushing new rules to allow more public input on panelists for the agency’s peer review committees. 

Find our content interesting and worth supporting?

Donate to The Center for Public Integrity.

Donate now
Donate now