Sinclair Broadcast Group officials did not return multiple requests for comment. Scott Livingston, Sinclair’s vice president for news, last year told the New York Times that Sinclair works “very hard to be objective and fair and be in the middle … maybe some other news organizations may be to the left of center, and we work very hard to be in the center.”
So how does Sinclair’s political giving compare to that of CNN and NBC — television news outlets Trump routinely reviles?
Time Warner, CNN’s parent company, switches from donating to one side or the other: its PAC gave more money to federal-level Democrats during six out of past 10 election cycles.
During the 2015-16 cycle, Democrats among the likes of Rep. Xavier Becerra of California ($5,000), Rep. Joseph Crowley of New York ($6,000) and Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland ($7,000) earned 52 percent of the PAC’s checks to candidates, or $203,000.
That trend continued into the 2017-2018 cycle, where Democrats are pulling in 53 percent of Time Warner’s PAC money to candidates, or almost $64,000. If you factor in employee donations, it’s a different story: Time Warner workers — primarily executives — overwhelmingly prefer to support Democrats.
Comcast, which owns NBC and MSNBC, donated more to federal-level Republican causes during the past four election cycles, largely favoring the right during the 2015-2016 election cycle. Republicans received 64 percent of Comcast PAC’s contributions to candidates, or about $1.4 million. Democrats received $800,000. So far in 2017 and 2018, Republicans received 60 percent of Comcast’s federal-level PAC contributions to candidates, or $715,000.
While Fox News’ broadcasts lean conservative, the PAC of its holding company, 21st Century Fox, donates liberally to Democrats.
During 2017 and 2018, more than half of Fox PAC’s contributions to candidates went to Democrats, such as $9,000 to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I.; $5,750 to Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn. and $5,000 to Sen. Bob Casey, D-Penn.
Fox PAC also gave $30,000 each to party committees aiming to elect Democrats and Republicans to each chamber: the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, the National Republican Congressional Committee and the National Republican Senatorial Committee, federal records indicate.
During 2015 and 2016, 45 percent of Fox PAC’s donations to candidates went to Democrats, according to Center for Responsive Politics data. Sens. Charles Schumer of New York and Brian Schatz of Hawaii pocketed $10,000, the most the PAC could legally give.
Already a broadcasting behemoth, Sinclair is looking to expand: 72 percent of American households would be covered by a Sinclair station if Sinclair acquires Tribune Media — a deal the Justice Department and Federal Communications Commission are reviewing. The New York Times reported that Sinclair is trying to pull strings within the Trump administration for a favorable outcome.
“President Trump’s tweet dismissing opposition to Sinclair’s destruction of local news shows how big media uses its money and power to influence our elected officials,” said former FCC commissioner and Common Cause adviser, Michael Copps, in a statement. “The FCC must block this merger [with Tribune Media.]”
Criticism of Sinclair stations’ coverage of Trump has been escalating for months.
CNN in March reported that some anchors and news staffers felt uncomfortable with Sinclair’s “fake news” campaign, which seemed to parrot the frequent “fake news” rants of Trump. Comedian John Oliver aired a segment last year critical of what he considers the company’s right-wing bent, such as cutting local news segments to instead run commentary from Sinclair’s chief political analyst, Boris Epshteyn, a former Trump aide. And Politico reported White House aide and Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner, bragged about making a deal with Sinclair: better media coverage for more access to Trump.
This article was co-published by Salon.
Stormy Daniels' payoff an illegal contribution? FEC ruling could take years
Saving face: Facebook wants access without limits
FCC says small cells will close the digital divide. Most say they won't